Cream Soda

a publishing platform for fun fearless and female fashion, beauty and lifestyle writers
October 11, 2009

Make Do And Mend: Quality Vintage Thats So Cheap Its Practically Free

by Rachel Phipps, founder and Editor In Chief of Lipstick Royalty Magazine, founder and writer of 'Cause I'd Rather Waste My Life Pretending

 

I love vintage. Fact. I have never brought a vintage piece from an online vintage store, vintage boutique or vintage fair. Another fact. Have you seen how much those places cost!?! Sometimes vintage stores charge more than if you had gotten the same piece from say, Topshop or Forever 21 just because its old. I know they get away with it for antique furniture but seriously? In these difficult, belt tightening times of the recession who can actually afford sometimes $200 for an old dress? Even if it is vintage? However you can still get vintage for less. Much less.

The first place you can look is, and don’t groan, charity shops. Charity shops tend to vary depending on where you live; if your area has a high disposable income people will have better clothes and they are more likely to give them away. If you don’t you’ll just have to look at the rails closely! When people shop in charity shops, looking for statement or core wardrobe pieces they look for the wrong things. The key is not to look for a whole piece, but for features on a piece. Found the most incredible bones corset dress but think the skirt is hideous? Hack it off and go to a fabric store to by some you’d like to be the skirt, or choose a fabric on another equally as bad piece in the charity store that you like the fabric of and make the two pieces into one. You don’t even have to be able to sew... fabric glue and safety pins will work just as well in a lot of cases. Just use a belt to cover the join! The same really applies as with charity shops to thrift stores, car boots sales... etc.

Another place to look is friends and family. Parents are good, the ’80’s are back so why not try asking people who actually around at the time for hand me downs? These pieces are more likely to be in a whole higher league than what you find in charity stores (unless you’ve been very lucky!) and they won’t cost you a thing. The same rules can apply to things you find in charity stores about the chopping and changing as well. Just yesterday I delved into my Mom’s ‘80’s wardrobe and pulled out an amazingly cut dress, and a floral patterned skirt but they were both practically ankle skimming even though I’m taller than her! But if I take them both up to make them knee length or just above the knee... the possibilities are endless!

August 27, 2009

Femfresh

by Faridah Folawiyo, founder and writer of Lunch On The Steps

 

I was reading an article in the Times two weeks ago by Janice Turner entitled When Feminism Went Nuts. The writer was complaining about the lack of feminism in this day and age how today’s woman cares too much for her outward appearance, spends too much money on hair products and stupidly obsesses over eradicating hair from her body parts and morphing into a testosterone stimulant rather than working to eradicate the more and more prevalent use of the woman as a sexual object..

 

Trying to create a woman who does not really care about her appearance, is almost suppressing us back to the origins of feminism, the rebellion we were stirred to by being squashed into one inferior box, without our consent. All women are different, and the attempt to create one type of feminist woman is hypocritical and insulting. Civil rights in America for example: Malcolm X was a Muslim man who believed in violence and/or any other methods necessary in order for blacks to gain equal rights, Martin Luther King Jr was a Baptist minister who campaigned peacefully, and was opposed to all violence, yet they both go down as people who championed for equal rights.

 

I believe in female rights, I believe in campaigning for them, but I see nothing wrong with doing so in my Chanel tweed suit, Hermes Kelly and sky-high Alaia shoes. I believe in respecting myself and so I will go and get a facial, and I will use L’oreal shampoo because I’m worth it.

 

There is a desperate absence of feminism in our generation, yet the way to revive it is not to tell a woman how to act and not to shave her legs. It is about re-establishing the principals. It is about making women aware of their power and allowing them to use it appropriately. For me, it is about seeing the most amazing, fierce Henry Beguelin bag and feeling that I have the strength to overcome its power and make it look tame on my arm. For others, it may be about not shaving their legs, not washing their hair, wearing rags, yet finding strength that burns within them and demanding respect from anyone and everyone.

 

What feminism certainly is not, is telling other women how to act or dress. In order to gain respect from everybody else, we must first respect ourselves. And I will not apologise for valuing myself much higher when I am hairless, fearless and in my Duro dress.


 

August 27, 2009

Its Sad But Its True

by Amy Claire Thompson, Fashion Editor at Lipstick Royalty Magazine and founder and writer of Confessions of a Fashion Editor.

 

“It's sad but it's true how society says
Her life is already over
There's nothing to do and there's nothing to say
Til the man of her dreams comes along picks her up and puts her over his shoulder
It seems so unlikely in this day and age”


- Lily Allen, “22


The first time that I heard this song, I wasn’t sure whether to laugh or cry; it’s so up-beat and crazily catchy that I loved it straight away… but then I listened more closely, and it started to remind me of an article I read in Company Magazine a couple of months back - about women who reach their mid-twenties and suddenly find that, because they haven’t lived all their dreams - they don’t have that job, they’re not married, they haven’t bought their own flat, yadda yadda yadda - they start obsessively planning how things should be from now on… or sort of end up giving up.


I accept that at seventeen years old I am in no position to judge, but I’d like to think that this shouldn’t be true, not in “this day and age”. I’ll admit to having dreams - I daydream more than anyone else on the planet (probably), and I know exactly how I want things in my life to go, but I accept here and now that I’m probably going to be wrong. I read romance novels (romance, not smut, before my Mum reads this…) - to the extent that my best friend once told me that I’ll never meet a guy who meets up to expectations because of how many fictional men I’ve fallen for. And sure, I can take that in my stride. I don’t need the “man of my dreams” to “come along, pick me up and put me over his shoulder”.


And… nor should these women. Not in this “day and age”.


The thing that gets me most about this song, though, is the video, which I watched just now as some kind of meagre attempt at researching this piece. It shows Lily Allen (obviously), and a whole load of other women dressed up to the nines, doing their make-up in the mirror of a night-club toilet… and it’s almost heart-breaking - it’s as if they’re all out there, searching for the guy who’ll come along and sweep them off their feet, and solve all their problems.


So, I suppose that the moral of this is that only you can make your dreams happen; only you control your future. You can’t dream your life away waiting for that Prince to role up, because, chances are, he won’t. So don’t bother.


Go out there, on your own, and show the world what you’re made of. Knock ‘em dead, you super-star.

 

 

August 25, 2009

I Just Realized I'm Not A Celebrity

by Faridah Folawiyo, founder and writer of Lunch On The Steps

 

I just realised I’m not a celebrity. After having looked at enough paparazzi pictures, watched enough E!, read enough blogs, I began to feel perhaps that I was a celebrity, albeit a G-lister, but still a celebrity. You know when you live vicariously through someone with a supposed better life, you begin to lose your identity? This has become my life.

 

I have dreams and goals of course. Not a day goes past without me envisaging myself on Oprah. I’m still perfecting my composed and cool, yet happy to be there (take note Kristen Stewart) laugh. The only problem is when I crack my million dollar joke, the audience doesn’t laugh, Oprah doesn’t laugh, even my mother doesn’t laugh. Of course, there is still time to perfect this joke.

 

As I get dressed every morning, I do so with the paparazzi in mind. I wouldn’t dare leave the house in tracksuits or anything that would be unsympathetic to my physique on camera. But, of course, the paps can’t know that I give them any thought whatsoever. They can’t be aware that they are the dictators of my supposed self-governed outfits. The A-listers don’t care for paparazzi, and neither does Faridah.

 

I have already seen myself at the Vanity Fair Oscar Party. The absolute top. The epitome of A-list. I got the red carpet over and done with as quickly as possible (didn’t want to seem too fame-whorish) and swiftly swept inside. It was heaven. I wore a Raf Simons for Jil Sander original and John Galliano shoes. I looked incredible.

 

You see? I have experienced the celebrity life, I have breathed the celebrity air. Yet, I recently came to terms with the fact that these mean nothing because in fact, I am not even a Z-lister. I am a nobody.

 

The only difference between me and any celebrity is a telling one, the most important thing. I only have 80 followers on Twitter. Kim Kardashian, a C-lister, has over 2 million followers Perez Hilton, a Y-lister has 1.4 million and even Jayde Nicole (I mean, who is she?) has almost 65000 followers. These figures have torn me apart, subdued all my aspirations, shattered all my dreams. Like you can’t be a doctor without Med school, you can’t be a celebrity without Twitter followers. If no-one follows you, no-one cares about you. If no-one cares about you, you are a nobody. So there is my epiphany, I have just found out that I am, in fact, nobody.

 

August 24, 2009

The Energy of Drama: In Defense of the “Nice Guy”

by Christine Garvin, founder and editor of Living Holistically... With a Sense of Humor and co-editor of Brave New Traveler


You know the drill: every girl says she wants a nice guy who really cares about her needs, wants and desires. She says this loudly over coffee or tea with her girlfriends, after relating the latest saga about how this guy pummeled her heart like an SUV flattens a chipmunk desperately trying to cross the road (not an environmental fella). She bemoans how he blatantly checks out other girl's tits when he's with her, can't seem to remember any of her friend's names, but instead differentiates them by "the hot one" "the fat one" "the big-nosed one" and "the beauty-challenged one." Whenever she simply lays her head on his shoulder as they watch a movie his hand immediately goes to her pants zipper. He's never on time, he texts instead of calls, he makes up excuses not to see her (unless it is 2am). "Why can't I just find a nice guy?" she wails, and then perks up when her phone beeps with a message from him. 

Well, let me think…is it because you keep on going after the jackasses?

Seeing this time and time again, I decided it was time to both defend and dispel the myths about the nice guy. The guy that every girl says she wants, but doesn't actually want. The guy that will bring you a fully worked-up Christmas tree when you live at the beach and are complaining about not being able to get into the Christmas spirit; the one who checks in to see what he can pick up for dinner when he is coming over to help you create a website; the one who always calls when he says he will, always answers the phone when you call, and always emails you back right away. The one that all your friends end up cooing about when you relate how he cleaned up your apartment and stocked your fridge after driving 30 miles every other day to feed your cat while you were away, and you are busy stifling a yawn. Ah, the nice guy...

Traditionally bemoaned in books, magazines, and movies as the one who is too soft, too considerate, too…dependable. Well ladies, you know it's partly about that dependability...no drama. Kinda no fun. We always classify men as being all about the chase, but aren’t we a bit after the chase ourselves? When a guy chats us up all night and then doesn’t ask for our number, we are invariably intrigued (and, at the same time, somewhat annoyed). When he shows up out of the blue at your front doorstep when you haven’t heard from him in two weeks, you secretly get that little thrill run up and down your body. The nice guy—he does none of these things. He is delighted when you call, he is there whenever you need him, and that makes you just long for some excitement.

This, of course, is an overly simplistic analysis. I think most nice guys have an edge—they just don't show it for whatever reason: past family issues, self-esteem/worth concerns, fear of driving others away (and sometimes, they do in fact show it). And women are attracted to men for much broader reasons than the fact that we are culturally-driven to become obsessive when a guy doesn’t call--please, no Sex in the City references here. But I think these situations are actually more about energy exchange than the battle of the sexes—if too much energy is placed on an object, that object will eventually break. If too much energy is placed on a living thing, it understands that it must escape in order to not be crushed (no pun intended). Nice guys often put way too much energy on the “woman of their dreams,” and women often put way too much energy on the “bad” boy.

Both of these are based on not knowing where we stand in a relationship, and the biological desire of humans to maintain “psychological” homeostasis (in other words, a sense of equilibrium) vs. the evolutionary necessity of change. For example (man or woman), think about when you feel really stable within a relationship—you begin to let your guard down, you start to see some of the faults in the other person instead of maintaining a belief in perfection. You may even begin to think, ‘Huh, do I need this relationship? Maybe I need a change?’ But suddenly the other person pulls away just a little bit, and you are knocked out of your (smug) homeostasis. Suddenly, on a very basic level, you are once again wondering where you stand with the other person and the energy is once again off kilter, trying to find its way back to level.

At the same time, some of us—from both sexes--have less of a sense of self, where we depend on the self of another to feel stable. Does this describe all nice guys? No. I would never blanket this bias on an entire group—simply being human means grappling with the issues of the self. We ALL question who and what we are at one time or another. But if we look at the nice guy as someone who is simply trying to work through some of his painful “stuff,” rather than a bore or an annoyance, we may be able to tip our own energy in the situation.

It also helps to be lovingly honest with them about where you stand. And stand firm in that—don’t switch it around when you want something from them.

But nice guys, you aren’t quite off the hook. You gotta admit you go for a certain type of girl. There are probably plenty of "nice girls" out there that are interested in you, and your eye doesn't even wander in their direction. Connect the dots between the last several women you have been attracted to, and then ask yourself what draws you to them.

It may be unconscious, but you may be doing the exact same thing to the nice girls that the mean girls have been doing to you.

Press Row theme designed by Chris Pearson